Moderator: Johan Sjöberg

Re: 1389

Postby Johan Käll » 15 Jul 2010, 14:09

Seem inprobable that The KING would plunder Rumlaborg, since that was his castle and according to some the place he rode out from.

Rumlaborg and Axwalla was roylar (or state) castles, of course he could plunder them so there would be notjhing left for the danes... but.. wasnt he captured at the battle?
User avatar
Johan Käll
Posts: 1455
Joined: 28 Feb 2008, 00:20
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: 1389

Postby Peter » 15 Jul 2010, 21:28

Of course. I really meant to say that it was the QUEEN that went to plunder. I will correct that.
Mordlysten krigsman, rå och hård i hjertat,
Och med ett samvete som helvet rymligt,
Skall rasa fritt med blodbestänkta händer
Och meja edra friska jungfrur af
Och edra fagra spenabarn som gräs
User avatar
Posts: 2543
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 02:03
Location: Kävlinge, Sweden


Return to Art History and History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests